Dexterity Outcomes in Friedreich Ataxia as Measured by mFARS and FA-ADL


Topic:

Clinical Management

Poster Number: 294 T

Author(s):

Sheng-Han Kuo, PhD, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, Syed Farooq, Biogen International GmbH, Claudia Yang Santos, PhD, Biogen, Inc., Shobhana Natarajan, PhD, Biogen, Inc., Jonathan Smith, MSc, Biogen Idec Ltd, Richard Lawson, MSc, Biogen

Objective: To assess the impact of Friedreich ataxia (FA) on the activities of daily living associated with dexterity at different levels of disease severity.

Background: FA is an autosomal-recessive, degenerative disease characterized by a decline in mobility and dexterity, affecting quality of life. There are limited data on how FA progression impacts dexterity as measured by the FA activities of daily living (FA-ADL) scale, and its association with the modified Friedreich’s Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS). Omaveloxolone slowed disease progression in the MOXIe Part 2 (MOXIe) trial vs. placebo. The Friedreich’s Ataxia Clinical Outcome Measures Study (FACOMS) registry provides 13 years of natural history data for patients with FA.

Methods: FA-ADL questions about dexterity (Q3: cutting food and handling utensils, Q4: dressing and Q5: personal hygiene) were assessed separately in both the FACOMS and MOXIe datasets to determine the proportion of patients with a score at or above the lower bound of selected 10-point mFARS ranges. All FA-ADL questions are scored 0-4 with higher scores representing worse outcomes.

Results: The percentage of patients with a score ≥3 on the FA-ADL cutting food question (meaning at minimum food needs to be cut by someone or eaten slowly) doubled for patients with an mFARS score 50-59 compared to 40-49 in FACOMS (10% vs. 5%). This was reflected in MOXIe (15% vs. 5%).

In FACOMS, 34% of patients with mFARS scores of 40-49 scored ≥2 on the FA-ADL dressing question (meaning at minimum assistance with buttoning or putting arms in shirt sleeves) compared to 20% for scores of 30-39. This was comparable in MOXIe with scores of 28% and 18% respectively.

The percentage of patients with a score of ≥2 on the FA-ADL hygiene question (meaning at minimum the need for devices like grab bars or some support with washing) was higher for patients with an mFARS score 40-49 (35% for FACOMS, 36% for MOXIe) compared with those with a score 30-39 (15% FACOMS and 8% MOXIe).

Conclusions: Dexterity outcomes measured by FA-ADL have a strong association with mFARS score, suggesting that mFARS can also capture dexterity progression in FA.