Background: Golodirsen and casimersen are phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) used for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Objectives: To report topline efficacy and safety results from the phase 3 ESSENCE trial (NCT02500381).
Methods: Eligible ambulatory males with DMD amenable to exon 53 (aged 6-13 y) or exon 45 (aged 7-13 y) skipping were randomized 2:1 to the combined treatment group (30 mg/kg golodirsen or casimersen; PMO) or placebo (PBO). A 96-wk double-blind period was followed by a 48-wk open-label period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in 4-step ascend velocity (step/s) at wk 96 vs PBO. Secondary functional, biological, and safety endpoints were reported. A prognostic scoring approach identified patients at high risk of 4-step ascend velocity decline (prognostically relevant subgroup [PRS]) for post hoc analysis. Results: 225 patients were enrolled from 2016 to 2022, including through the COVID-19 pandemic, across 24 countries. Baseline characteristics were well matched. At wk 96, the primary endpoint in the PMO group (n=138) showed a numerical mean (SD) change of −0.27 (0.39) steps/s vs PBO (n=74; −0.34 [0.37]), least squares mean (LSM) difference 0.06 (95% CI, −0.05 to 0.16; =0.309). Although not statistically significant, most secondary endpoints favored PMO. At wk 144, 4-step ascend velocity was −0.004 (−0.123 to 0.115). At wk 96, 6-minute walk test distance was 5.34 (−23.32 to 34.00), 10-meter walk/run velocity was 0.020 (−0.097 to 0.137), rise from floor velocity was −0.003 (−0.020 to 0.014), and North Star Ambulatory Assessment was 0.61 (−0.90 to 2.12). At wk 96, dystrophin expression by western blot had a mean difference of CFB of 0.69 (0.28 to 1.10; <0.001; unadjusted) and 1.25 (0.20 to 2.31; =0.020; muscle-content adjusted). Dystrophin fiber intensity by immunohistochemistry had a mean difference of CFB of 0.023 (0.015 to 0.031; <0.001). Through wk 144, no new safety signals were reported. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved without treatment. The PRS (PMO, n=74; PBO, n=35) suggested a meaningful change in 4-step ascend velocity at wk 96 for the PMO group (LSM difference vs PBO, 0.186 steps/s; =0.010).Conclusions: ESSENCE confirms the established safety profile of golodirsen and casimersen. The primary endpoint was not met in ESSENCE. A post hoc analysis and the totality of PMO evidence suggest the clinical benefits of golodirsen and casimersen.