Reliability of myometry and clinical outcomes in two steroid-naïve clinical trial-based cohorts of young boys with DMD


Topic:

Clinical Trials

Poster Number: Virtual

Author(s):

Rebecca Tobin, Carleton University, Eric Hoffman, Binghamton University, Michela Guglieri, MD, Newcastle University, Paula Clemens, University of Pittsburgh, VBP15-004 and VBP15-LTE Investigators, CINRG, Utkarsh Dang, PhD, Carleton University

Background
Some common outcomes to monitor progression and treatment response in clinical care and clinical trials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) include strength-based outcomes, e.g., myometry, as well as motor functional tests, e.g., timed function tests, six-minute walk test, and Northstar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). The VBP15-002 (n=48 participants; 11 sites in 6 countries) and VBP15-004 (n=121 participants; 33 sites in 11 countries) clinical trials in DMD provided two independent, well-controlled cohorts, with harmonized outcomes and protocols.

Objective
To present test-retest reliability of outcomes in two cohorts using screening and baseline measurements.

Methods
All outcomes including velocities from three timed tests: stand from supine (TTSTANDV), climb 4 steps (TTCLIMBV), and run/walk 10m (TTRWV) were measured in both cohorts. Two different techniques were used for myometry in VBP15-002 (CINRG Quantitative Measurement System [CQMS]) and VBP15-004 (MicroFET2 handheld digital muscle dynamometer) cohorts. We calculated intraclass correlation and coefficient of variation.

Results
The median number of days between screening and baseline was 28 (min=10 and max = 69; IQR = 8) and 15 (min=2 and max = 28; IQR = 10) days for VBP15-004 and VBP15-002, respectively. Using complete pooled data, for NSAA, we obtained ICC = 0.89 (95% CI = [0.85-0.92]), for TTRWV: 0.88, for TTCLIMBV: 0.87, for SIXMWDIS: 0.76, and for TTSTANDV: 0.68. Higher ICC were obtained for dynamometer as compared to CQMS for knee extensors but not for elbow flexor; however, the confidence intervals were wide and overlapping. Reliability decreased with younger age for TTSTANDV. Removing outliers improved the reliability. %CV did not always agree with ICC trends.

Conclusions
Two cohorts of boys with DMD yielded good reliability for commonly used clinical outcomes. A nuanced comparison of hand-held myometry measurements vs. CQMS emerged. Age, outliers, and test difficulty were found to influence reliability but not days between repeated measurements.